patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Ellen Dickson New Summit Mayor as GOP Candidates Sweep

Summit's voter turnout is around 36 percent.

 

At one point on Tuesday, it seemed like it could be anyone's mayoral race. At the senior center on Chestnut Avenue, an octogenarian who considers herself a Democrat said she voted for Ellen Dickson. A patron at the Summit Diner when pressed about the election said he didn't care who won, "as long as Michael Vernotico became mayor." Another voter, who said she met with Democratic candidates at a block party over the summer said she voted for Eileen Ludden because she felt like she "knew" her.

Mayor Jordan Glatt made history as Summit's first Democratic mayor in a century and as he decided not to seek re-election, Dickson won the election that will return a Republican to office again. With three candidates seeking to take over his post, Dickson won her mayoral bid with 1,954 votes, or 39 percent of votes, topping Democrat Eileen Forman Ludden, who earned 1,699 votes, or 34 percent. Independent candidate Michael Vernotico trailed with 1,313 votes, or nearly 26 percent.

According to the unofficial polling results Dickson won the most votes in Ward I in Districts 5 and 7, earning two-times as many votes as Ludden. 

Rounding out the Repubican ticket winners were Rob Rubino, who won Ward 1 with 55 percent of the vote; Gregory Drummond who took his At-Large post with 53.6 percent; and in a tight race for Ward 2 councilman, Patrick Hurley who edged past A. Dennis White with 50.3 percent of the vote. 

Andy Smith of Summit earned 27,635 votes or 18 percent in his bid for Union County freeholder.

A total of 4,925 Summit voters took to the polls this election out of 13,522 registered voters in the city, or just over 36 percent of those registered bothered to vote. Turnout in Ward 2 was just 2.3 percent higher than in Ward I.

 

Related Topics: Election 2011, Ellen Dickson, Summit Elections 2011, Summit Mayor, Summit Mayoral Election, and Summit Republican City Committee

Daniel MacMahon

12:37 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

"Points"? Was this an election or a sporting contest?

Reply

T Durden

7:21 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

"..it is warm inside the herd...but then, of course, you can go off the cliff... " jm eveillard
here's hoping for the best for our town and its residents...we are going to need it...back to project mayhem...

Reply

Big Pitcher

8:37 am on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Some thoughts on the City election: 1)Congratulations to Ellen and the winners. Hopefully you will learn from and avoid last year's mistakes, 2)The Dems and Vernotico should let the politics go and provide constructive criticism when warrented, 3) FOIA requests should be used for legitimate purposes and not as last minute gotcha campaign tactics, 4) the PBA should remain impartial and stay out of local elections, 5) people should visit www.didyouknowUC.com and work to hold our County government accountable.

Reply

ressummit

12:30 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Most telling statement by Forman-Ludden as quoted in the Alternative Press - she was disappointed and "feared for the future of Summit". Speaks volumes about why she lost. Tired of attack politics.

Reply
Comment_arrow

summit43

12:36 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Nasty election strategy by the democrats resulted in a republican sweep. Time to stick to real issues if they intend to do right by well-credentialed, democratic candidates in the future.

Peter Harper

12:49 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

I appreciate Camilo's comment, we should keep comments civil on these boards. It's otherwise hypocritical to require that of our elected officials and then suspend that standard for ourselves.
I'm not crazy about any one single party holding these important positions for the town, so i'm hopeful that the local media and active citizens keep these folks honest. I think it's perhaps the most important role the Patch plays for Summit.
Also, per summit43's comment, I barely saw the Democrats campaigning--there was much more from Dickson and Vernotico, and I think Ludden could have made a difference with more campaigning.

Reply

T Durden

1:23 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

...brilliant!! 1, but ...you came up with all that verbiage (troll, turd..) on your own?...awesome...well done...he/she will be here all night...don't forget to tip your waitress...

...i will chip in my final 2 cents...first, i am a registered independent.. independents controlled yesterday's election in summit?...thats laughable...i'm sure independents swayed this election when there was 36% turnout...comical...but i'm sure you have more than nonsense to back up your claims...back to project mayhem

Reply

TomK

1:30 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

For Bill Wilson: They are taking down your posts because all you do is attack people. Continuing your attacks after the election just makes you sound like a sore loser.

Reply

Big Pitcher

2:31 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Alas, Poor Wilson! I knew him: a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is! Where be your gibes now? your gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not one now, to mock your own grinning? quite chap-fallen?

Reply

Bill Wilson

2:47 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

I'm back.... Camilo, this is going to be very difficult for you. Let the cat and mouse game begin!

Reply

1, but not alone

4:45 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

I should not have made derogatory comments about certain commenters. I am sorry. But, "project mayhem" and the media on the payroll of the victorious mayoral candidate? Really? If you have a point, it is lost, and I agree with the notion in this thread that you are hurting the marketplace of ideas and in fact the candidates you seem to favor. We on this board may not deserve better, but our volunteer politicians surely do.

Reply

bill wilson

4:50 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

what do you mean by "project mayhem"

and how do you explain 1) patch taking down my comments, 2) blocking my accoutn and 2) most tellingly, over the last three weeks sliding in on the bottom right the dickson endorsement letter and nothing else?

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

7:14 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Vast right wing conspiracy, Bill. We're everywhere...Even on the ultra liberal Huffington Post owned Summit Patch :-)

summit43

5:03 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Good for the editor for calming the discussion. Mr. Wilson, it is disappointing to see your candidates lose, but the winners are your fellow neighbors and volunteers.

Reply

BJ Coghan

6:18 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Is there a reason people do not use their real names?

Reply

Eileen Z. Wolter

6:53 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

BJ - people don't use their names because masks allow them to say things they'd never say if identified . . .

I hardly think this was a "sweep" with paltry and embarrassingly low turnout. And I'll come right out and say I'm a Democrat and thought Eileen and her slate were better suited to help shape Summit's future. I'm disappointed "we" lost but am (slightly) hopeful Mayor-elect Dickson (whose Internet crew I applaud because they'd updated the Summit Wikipedia page by 10pm last night....do they may be serious about that app!) but nothing will be accomplished by continued focus on the negative issues on that Did You Know website....(which was a late-ish Republican funded campaign gambit) especially when our Freeholders are Democrats and I'm suspecting Summit Republicans are loathe to look beyond labels... if we are paying an unfair amount into Union County, let's address that but lets address local issues first and foremost and with a modicum of modesty and common sense (no more parking studies) and do it where the sun shines, please...

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

8:21 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Actually Eileen the use of pseudonyms is less sinister than you imply with your "mask" comment. One major reason anonymous names are used in online political discussions is that liberal progressives have a tendency to personalize a policy debate and demonize known debate opponents that hold different views. Some will go so far as to visit opponent's homes (Acorn and Occupy Wall Street) or attempt to get people fired or otherwise boycott or harm their businesses for expressing their opinions and using their first amendment rights (Wisconsin Collective Bargaining). Unfortunately the internet is forever and everywhere so one can't rely on a friendly neighbor with an opposing view to keep comments in context.

Used properly without Ad Hominem attacks there are a variety of issues and ideas that can be factually debated online (ie affirmative action, abortion, racism, gay marriage, New Jersey Pension reform etc. etc.) without the emotional default racist, sexist, anti-middle class name-calling accusations that occur in face to face discussions the moment a liberal progressive has lost a debate.

If your facts and ideas are better it shouldn't matter whether you know who I am or not...unless you want to be able to play an emotional trump card to deflect the discussion away from facts.

Comment_arrow

summitdude

9:56 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

County problems are local problems. You should tell the dems to follow walter long's lead and take the gloves off with the county.

Big Pitcher

7:13 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Yup, there is no way I would quote Shakespere if people knew who I was. But please. The conduct of the Union County Freeholders is (unlike the Summit Council) truly corrupt and indefensible and needs to be able to be available to all Summit citizens and the website does just that. We're not talking about Kittygate or Getz's emails into cyberspace. I understand the attraction of having a Council that will "play ball" with the Freeholders, but that doesn't make it right.

Reply

bill wilson

8:08 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

camilo, big pitcher called people corrupt. pls remove his post like you did to my posts using similar adjectives. and if you don't you're part of the corrupt right wing media establishment

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

8:33 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Bill, Now you are just embarrassing yourself.

bill wilson

8:38 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

no i'm embarrasing patch, and all the other right-wing loons on this site.

Reply

ressummit

8:40 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

20 year summit resident - your response to Wolter was eloquently crafted.. Well done and well thought out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

9:28 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Thank you ressummit. Sadly the points did not hit home as demonstrated in EW's response.

bill wilson

8:43 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

and your comment re: ad hominem attacks is ridiculous. that is squarely the domain of the right... do you not watch fox new. it's all ad hominem (obama's 3% proposed tax increase = he's a SOCIALIST; his father is Kenyan = his birth certificate is FORGED). What world are you living in?

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

8:52 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Sources for your comments, Bill?

Daily KoZ, Huff PO, MSNBC?

Blogs have a term for what you are doing to your online reputation here...It's called "Beclowning" one's self.

Eileen Z. Wolter

8:55 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

It's just so hard to take all of you masked ick-or-treaters seriously. If you really care and are really committed you won't fear any sort of retribution. In my opinion, only bullies who are too weak to put their faces where their words are are actually worth engaging with. For this I applaud anyone who ever runs for office, no matter wing your riding on. And I stand by my assertion that this Mayor-elect Dickson with a win of 255 points is hardly entering into office with any sort of mandate. But you nameless, faceless few will no doubt have loads of truly rational things to say about that...

Reply
Comment_arrow

summitdude

10:08 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

You shouldn't question the process or results. By clouding the numbers with remarks about low turnout and mandates you're attempting to diminish the final result. It puts you in the same section as birthers. When your candidate doesn't win you question the process. Elections matter. The turnout was no less then when Jordan won two terms and so Ellen will be no less a Mayor then he was.

Had Eileen won the race I would not be questioning her mandate but rather congratulating her and seeing how I can help.

BJ Coghan

8:56 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Pretty sad about names. As a 65 year resident, I can recall plenty of great discussion where people respected each other. You must admit, the use of pseudonyms allows people to say hurtful things that they would not, if identified. My pseudonym would be Pollyanna.

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

9:19 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

BJ, I agree with you that there are plenty of anonymous internet posters that say vile things to other posters and that make vicious foul-languaged attacks. It's never really fun to endure a verbal attack but the consolation in these cases is that it means they have run out of words and ideas to support their view and they've lost the debate.

20 year Summit Resident

9:09 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

If you honestly believe that liberals do not make personal attacks or bring family and personal ives into a policy discussion then you are not paying attention.

Your opinions are lovely but it is a fact that Ex-Republican Vernotico split the vote and Dickson still won. It is also a fact that Ms. Ludden is, pardon me, a lightweight community organizer (sound familiar) with no elected office experience. It is a frequent fact that democrats rarely seem to admit that they LOST fair and square in the marketplace of ideas or popularity contest. Instead it is always a communication problem or a voter stupidity problem or a low turnout problem that makes democrats lose elections. Your excuses diminish your well wishes to Dickson.

Please rebut me loudly and proudly, Eileen, if it's not beneath you to debate ideas from someone that you don't know.

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

9:20 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

To clarify my 9:09pm post was a response to Eileen Wolter.

Comment_arrow

bill wilson

10:26 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

"lightweight community organizer"... now that's an ad hominem attack.

Hypocrite alert!

T Durden

9:57 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

...i will like to chip in here...vernotico split the republican vote?...please enlighten us with some data...or is that your opinion?...figured...of course you take your shots at the opposing candidate...lightweight community organizer? i guess you meant that as a complement..comical...pls clue me in on dickson's conservative record?...i'm still waiting...back to project mayhem

Reply
Comment_arrow

summit43

10:32 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

2 "republicans" v. one democrat and dickson still won. That's a mandate, Eileen. Ludden should have walked away with the election, but just didn't have much support. With equal #s of registered r's and d's, this should have been a slam dunk for her. Congrats to dickson.

Comment_arrow

bill wilson

10:37 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

You're kidding, right summit43? Dickson had the full weight of Summit Patch behind her. They linked to nothing other than the letter to the editor supporting dickson, which made it appear as an editorial from patch. Completely outrageous example of media bias.

bill wilson

10:32 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

From Fox: Obama's a socialist. He's unamerican. He's racist. and the list goes on and on. You're kidding when you purport that Fox doesnt traffic in 24/7 ad hominem attacks on our president.

Reply
Comment_arrow

20 year Summit Resident

11:09 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Wow Bill, You are unravelling before our eyes. What happened to talking about the Summit elections? You appear to have Fox derangement syndrome.

Do you know the difference between news and opinion? You have no idea what you're talking about do you? C'mon admit it....You watch highly edited clips on Maddow or Ed Schultz and that is your sourcing.

If you had any sense of American history, economics, foreign policy and capitalism you would understand how out of the mainstream President Obama is. It's getting late. I need to go to bed and you need to get back to Zuccotti Park. Sweet dreams Bill....Just remember that conservatives are everywhere, maybe even under your bed editing for patch.

Robert Steelman

11:30 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Sorry did I miss something. Is there a question about the vote count and election results? Just how long will it take some of you to get over the disappointment? Your candidate did not win. For those of you that want to move forward, here is a suggestion. Find a worthwhile City project and make a meaningful contribution. The election results lead me to the conclusion that a worthwhile project is not a renewed effort to undermine your elected volunteers. Instead I think you’ll find the governing body motivated by your thoughtful participation. It might be useful to not just oppose something you don’t like but to advocate for something that will provide future benefits to the community. My top 3 are: How do you encourage City Hall to be more responsive and less costly to taxpayers? What efforts are needed to support new City businesses so they may thrive and survive? What changes are needed to planning policy to encourage appropriate reinvestment and redevelopment? It's a new day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

BJ Coghan

5:13 pm on Thursday, November 10, 2011

Well said. It's so easy to be critical of others when you have not walked in their shoes. Or more practically done any of the hard work. Change is good. Even if it's not the change you wanted. Get involved. Volunteer. And move on.

T Durden

11:46 pm on Wednesday, November 9, 2011

...his name was robert steelman..his name was robert steelman...

..yes indeed, more responsive and less costly to tax payers...couldn't agree more...is this the group that can do that?...i guess we will see...

Reply

lisa

8:14 am on Thursday, November 10, 2011

This whole conversation should be deleted! Sore winners, sore losers...pathetic attacks on neighbors and residents when this town has real issues to deal with.

Good or bad, we need to accept the new makeup of our town council and we need to send them the mandate. Whether dem or rep, it's likely the mandate is the same.. Safety, better schools, thriving downtown, shared services, oversight of county. The differences are how we accomplish the mandate..that would be an effective conversation..not these ridiculous, offensive arguments. Do we really want these problems to be solved? If so, then let's have the appropriate argument. All these attacks are obfuscating the real problems.

As to anonymous posts. We've all said it before. Good, bad or otherwise we post anonymously, especially when discussing the schools so we don't have retribution towards our children in the schools. It is what it is. It's the same explanation everytime. There is no need to continue asking.

Reply

Leave a comment