Politics & Government

State Supreme Court: Special Election Can Go On As Planned

The legal challenge to Gov. Chris Christie's call for an Oct. 16 election will not be heard by the state's highest court.

Story written and reported by Political Reporter Keith Brown

The state Supreme Court Thursday afternoon said it will not hear a challenge to the October special election to fill the U.S. Senate seat of late Sen. Frank Lautenberg.

In a single-page opinion handed down Thursday afternoon, the court dismissed the challenge brought by Somerset Democratic Chair Peg Schaffer, who argued Gov. Chris Christie did not have the authority to create the Oct. 16 special election.

Chief Justice Stuart Rabner said Schaffer’s request for the court to hear the case is denied.

Schaffer argued that Gov. Chris Christie overstepped his authority in setting the election just 20 days before the regular Nov. 5 polling date and that voters would be unnecessarily confused and disenfrachised by Christie's move.

Schaffer said she was disappointed in the court's decision.

"We tried to fix it and we were unsuccessful,'' Schaffer said. "I know the public sentiment is very much against this hodge-podge of back-to-back elections and hopefully they express that at the appropriate times.''

Find out what's happening in Summitwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

NJ Citizen Action, a government watchdog group that filed a brief in support of Schaffer’s case, expressed disappointment with Thursday’s decision.

"I think we had a strong argument, that the legislature wanted to avoid special elections because of costs associated with it," said Ann Vardeman, an organizer with NJ Citizen Action. "The cost of this special election is unnecessary and wasteful."

Find out what's happening in Summitwith free, real-time updates from Patch.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here